On July 31, 2002, members of the Knoxville
Tree Board met with Mike Fowler to discuss the proposed Market Square/Krutch
Park/Market Street plan. Details
of the proposal follow:
- 26 trees would be replaced with 28
trees
- 16 Bradford Pears would come out of
Krutch Park
- 10 willow oaks along Market Street
would be taken out, to be replaced with six trees.
- Six sawtooth oaks and 4-5 maples on
Market Square would be removed.
- No details of species of trees to
replace the existing trees have been "worked out," however
pin oaks would not be considered
- The fence around Krutch Park would be
taken down
- The water feature in Krutch Park would
be refurbished
- Willow oaks along Market Street are
considered by the designers to be "on the centerline of the mall" and
presenting a "position issue" with their 25' centers
- Bricks that are coming up around
willow oaks are considered to be a liability problem by the
designers
- Willow oaks would be revealed to be
"flat-sided" should the Bradford Pears be removed from Krutch
Park, which would be considered to be a negative
- There is concern over the fact that the
sawtooth oaks in the square obscure visibility from one end of the
square to the other
- When pressed on the absolute need for
symmetry, Mr. Fowler said, "Symmetry is important to connect
the geometry of the two blocks"
- Attention would be paid to the "hardscape"
(the pavement and concrete features)
- Maples in the square would be
transplanted elsewhere
- "Large-scale" 10-12"
caliper trees would be planted
- Mayor Ashe is said to be "leaning
in the direction" of the plan (although no final decision has
been made) and "committed to making redevelopment
happen."
- No hard copy was available for the
board; the only copy of the drawing is with Mr. Fowler.
Discussion centered around:
- Species selection (this has not been
considered yet)
- Need to retain some trees,
rather than wiping out everything for a clean slate. It was
suggested to retain at least the sawtooth oaks in the square as a
"legacy grove."
- Disagreement over the age of the
sawtooth oaks; some think 1970s they were planted, others certain
that they were planted as recently as 1986. These trees are
21" in diameter.
- The absolute need for
"symmetry" at the expense of the mature tree canopy we
already have, and which could continue to beautify downtown for
generations to come.
- Suggestions to reach a compromise and
retain the sawtooth oaks and perhaps the willow oaks and gain
visibility by pruning the lower branches. It was pointed out
that one can stand at Clinch Avenue even now and see the stage at
the north end of Market Square. Pruning of the lower branches would
make this view a clear shot.
- Lack of city maintenance which has
created the problems that the designers and tree board see with the
trees; how will future policy be changed to ensure the new trees'
care? It was pointed out that no degreed arborist works for
the city.
- Importance of avoiding a monoculture:
species-specific disease could wipe out entire stock of trees. The board
suggested that they be used to recommend types of trees for the
plan.
- The blank wall of the Am South
building and the height of both of the buildings surrounding the
Krutch Park extension: park extension was seen to be "dead
space" and problematic to deal with, even in the proposed
drawing showing the trees against the buildings. Mr. Fowler
replied that these trees are really considered to be"placeholders"
by the designers, for
future redevelopment that may be considered.
- "Compartmentalization,"
which will be a problem with the transplanted trees. When any
tree is transplanted, the diameter of the tree at the time of
replanting begins to die off. After the tree gets over the
initial stress of the transplanting process and begins to grow
(sometimes taking years), there will be eventually be a hollow core
inside the trunk the same size as the tree as when it was
planted. This is why the transplanting of large trees is so
problematic, despite the expense of using larger trees ($5 - 10k
apiece).
- The large willow tree in the park that
is very close to the water feature: the tree board members consider
it to have a lot of character and desire for it to be retained;
however, it is likely that it would be destroyed by the process of
refurbishing the water feature as proposed.
- The assessment that the willow oaks
"flat-sided" character is reason to destroy them: the
board believes that the flat-sided-ness is very subtle, except for
the northernmost oak on Union Ave.
- The maples in the square: these have
existed under very harsh conditions (little soil for the roots) and
therefore have grown very little since they were planted.

Home
| About Us | Tree Board | Tree
Ordinance Street
Tree Plan |
Market Square | Krutch
Park
Favorite
Links | Tree Poetry
| Email
|